For months, Oleksiy has been fighting to hold a thin strip of land surrounded by Russian forces.

Now he’s been rushed to defend Moscow’s onslaught in the Kharkiv region, like many other soldiers scrambled from other parts of Ukraine’s front line.

It’s a redeployment symptomatic of this war’s new focus.

We’ve been in touch with Oleksiy for the past nine months. Now from north-eastern Ukraine, he’s described the difference in fighting as “huge”.

Despite limited supplies, minimal gains and mounting losses, Kyiv insists its southern foothold on the occupied eastern bank of Dnipro River is still significant.

It’s where Oleksiy had been fighting for the past eight months. We’ve agreed not to reveal his real name.

We last spoke with him six months ago, where he described the conditions on the swampy riverside as “hell”.

Things haven’t improved.

“We’d managed to maintain the bridgehead, but no equipment has crossed it, and we haven’t once broken through Russian defences,” he says.

The marine tells us the area had been reduced to a “moonscape”, with entire villages being razed to their foundations.

The Ukrainians have also suffered heavy losses there too.

“We destroyed a lot of Russian equipment, and they destroyed a lot of our personnel,” he says. “We’ve left our best guys on the riverside.”

Despite minimal progress and mounting losses, Ukraine’s military says it’s pursuing three aims with this bridgehead:

• To draw invading troops from elsewhere
• To limit Russian artillery strikes on Kherson city across the river
• To eventually cross it in large enough numbers to liberate territory

Oleksiy says promised US military aid was gradually starting to arrive, but not all of it was making it to the front line where he was based.

Despite partially forcing the Russians back, Ukrainian troops still endure constant Russian fire.

“Any movement was immediately covered by artillery or drones,” he explains. “The Russians didn’t seem concerned by our presence there either; we had become a suitcase without a handle.

“The troops there can’t leave, and everyone understands that’s useless.”

It’s hoped a new mobilisation law, which came into force last month, will help give troops like those fighting on the eastern bank a rest.

“It won’t change anything!” says Boston, a flamethrower unit commander who is still fighting on the eastern bank. Boston is his military code name.

He sends us videos of him on patrol in Krynky by the riverside. At one point he shoots a Russian anti-personnel mine hidden beneath the sand.

“People should join the army from 20,” he says. “But there is a problem, a lot of men went abroad [to escape the draft]. No-one wants to come back, no-one wants to fight, and no-one wants to die.”

We put their testimonies to Dmytro Pletenchuk, the spokesman for Ukraine’s South Defence Forces.

“Compared to Russian losses, ours are significantly smaller,” he explains. “Secondly, we lose soldiers on this part of the front line no more than in other areas.”

By definition, a conscript will never be as motivated as a volunteer. It’s also easier to inspire troops when fighting is going your way. For Ukraine, and especially on the eastern bank, it isn’t.

It’s possibly why Mr Pletenchuk strikes a sympathetic tone when we tell him about allegations of troop disobedience on the eastern bank.

“Those who have been forced to defend their country are yesterday’s civilians,” says Mr Pletenchuk with a smile. “They will of course have a different perception of the army.”

Ahead of the arrival of more Western military aid, Ukrainian generals believe Russia is trying to expand the battlefield and further stretch their defending units.

Invading troops are more than a month into a north-eastern ground offensive, and while Ukraine has slowed their advances, there’s been no letting up.

It’s why Oleksiy now finds himself hundreds of kilometres away from the Kherson region.

“Everything happened in a hurry and there was no preparation,” he says.

“Everyone is here: marines, air assault forces, the State Border Guard Service, regular infantry, territorial defence and national police.”

“There are also more drones in the sky compared to the east bank of the Dnipro.”

Moscow is currently on top in this industrialised conflict, with Kyiv struggling to counter its manpower, weaponry, and tactics.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky concedes time is running out for a diplomatic solution which favours Ukraine, which is why he recently held a peace summit in Switzerland.

It was about building global support for peace on his terms. While almost 80 countries signed an agreement, important regional powers in Africa, the Middle East and South Asia did not.

Russia wasn’t invited, but before the meeting, Vladimir Putin had demanded Ukrainian troops withdraw from four regions which he partially occupies.

His conditions are as maximalist as they are unrealistic, but his battlefield dominance means a potential peace deal could better match his terms than Kyiv’s.

President Zelensky admits his priority is to simply hold the front line. If his troops manage that before the arrival of autumn and more difficult fighting conditions, it would be viewed as a success.

Also, he claims there are still plans for a counter offensive in the future.

If Oleksiy survives defending the Kharkiv region, he could find himself back at Ukraine’s “hellish” river crossing in the south.

Additional reporting by Anastasiia Levchenko and Hanna Chornous