Family to sue prison service over death of inmate
The family of a man who died after being restrained by up to 17 prison officers is suing the Scottish Prison Service, the Crown Office and Scottish ministers over his death.
Allan Marshall died days after being held face down by prison officers at HMP Edinburgh in 2015.
In what is thought to be one of the first cases of its kind in Scotland, his family has now raised a civil court action under human rights laws for a breach of his right to life.
Their lawyers said the aim was to ensure those responsible were âheld to accountâ and to try to enact change within the Scottish prison system â which has one of the highest rates of deaths behind bars in Europe.
If the case is successful, it could result in a substantial financial penalty for the SPS, the Crown Office and the Scottish government.
Mr Marshall, from Carluke in South Lanarkshire, was 30 when he died nine years ago while on remand awaiting a court appearance over unpaid fines and breach of the peace charges.
Officers said he had become agitated, but rather than calling for medical assistance, they moved him to the segregation unit and physically restrained him, holding him face down.
Much of the incident was captured on CCTV.
At various times it involved 17 prison officers with some of them using their feet, which is not a technique that is taught for use when restraining inmates.
According to the fatal accident inquiry, one officer said he used his feet 10 or more times and also stamped on Mr Marshall. He later admitted it was totally out of order.
Mr Marshall died in hospital four days later.
The cause of death was brain injury due to cardiac arrest during physical restraint.
An independent psychiatrist told a BBC Disclosure investigation, Mr Marshall was clearly suffering psychosis and needed psychiatric help.
Last year the BBC revealed Police Scotland had been told to investigate whether the Scottish Prison Service should be prosecuted over his death.
The lord advocate instructed police to examine whether the prison service had corporate responsibility but the family said there had been little progress since then.
Despite much of the restraint being recorded on CCTV no-one has been held accountable for what happened to Mr Marshall.
The Crown Office â Scotlandâs prosecution service â granted full immunity to all prison officers at HMP Edinburgh, ruling out any prosecution.
Earlier this year the BBC revealed a Crown Office review had said the decision to give immunity had been âincorrectâ.
Mr Marshallâs aunt, Sharon MacFadyen, has now raised a court claim against the prison service using human rights laws.
The right to life is protected under Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, incorporated into UK law through the Human Rights Act 1998.
Her lawyers said that the Crownâs decision to grant immunity to the prison officers meant this was now one of the only remaining routes to securing accountability.
Ms MacFadyenâs court action is also directed against Police Scotland and the Crown Office, for breach of their duty to adequately investigate Mr Marshallâs death and hold those responsible to account, which is also a requirement under Article 2.
Mr Marshallâs brother Alistair said: âWeâve been fighting for justice for Allan for nine years.
âAllan was killed in prison when he needed medical support.
âNo-one has been held responsible for that. The system has failed Allan. We hope that through this court case we can finally get accountability.â
Barbara Bolton, legal director of JustRight Scotland who is working on the case, said: âThis case highlights the urgent need for transparency in deaths that occur in State custody.
âResearch shows a troubling rise in these deaths, reflecting preventable issues within the prison system.
âHuman rights law, particularly Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, mandates that the State protects the right to life.
âThorough investigation and holding those responsible to account are essential for delivering justice to families and addressing critical issues within the prison system.â
A Scottish Prison Service spokesman said: âOur thoughts remain with Mr Marshallâs family. As this is subject to proceedings it would be inappropriate to comment further.â
A Police Scotland spokeswoman said: âWe have received instruction from the lord advocate to investigate possible corporate responsibility by the Scottish Prison Service.
âWe are not able to comment further at this time due to the live nature of this investigation.â
The Scottish government also said its condolences remain with the family but could not comment further at this time.