Referee ādidnāt likeā Rice red card in Brighton draw
-
Published
Referee Chris Kavanagh said he ādidnāt likeā the decision to send off Declan Rice in Arsenalās draw with Brighton last month, but said he āhad no choiceā.
Rice was sent off during the 1-1 draw at the Emirates Stadium for a second yellow card after nudging the ball away from Joel Veltman as he prepared to take a free-kick.
Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta said he was āamazed, amazed, amazedā at the decision immediately after the match.
Audio released on Tuesday night from the Premier Leagueās latest episode of Micād Up revealed Kavanagh said he had no choice but to show the England midfielder a second booking.
āI donāt like it, but heās knocked the ball,ā said Kavanagh.
āSecond yellow, for me. I had no choice, he knocks the ball away. As [Veltmanās] about to kick it, he knocks the ball.
āI have no choice. Heās put me in an awful position. Dec, you need to go Iām afraid.ā
The decision, supported by the Key Match Incidents panel, was also backed by Howard Webb, chief operation officer of the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL).
āHeās clearly seen Declan Rice commit a foul, then kick the ball away for an opponent that was in the process of taking a free-kick,ā Webb told Micād Up.
āWeāve messaged very clearly and strongly to the players in pre-season around the importance of not getting involved with the ball once the whistle is gone, not delaying the restart in that way.
āOnce heās seen Declan Rice deliberately, clearly kick that ball away from the position of that free-kick, then I donāt think heās got any choice.ā
In the same match, Brighton forward Joao Pedro also kicked the ball away, but received no punishment.
While Webb felt they were different scenarios, he did say Kavanagh should have booked the Seagullsā forward.
āIt sits in the same kind of book around delaying the restart. Of course, he should have been cautioned here,ā said Webb.
āThe officials on the field gave him too much benefit of doubt.
āThey do delay Arsenalās ability to restart. Weāve certainly messaged that back to the officials.ā
Decision to rule out Ouattara goal āwrongā
Among the six decisions assessed in the latest edition of Micād Up was Bournemouthās disallowed late goal against Newcastle United.
Dango Ouattaraās header from a corner was ruled out late on at the Vitality Stadium, with the ball hitting the top of his arm.
With no conclusive evidence as to whether the ball was low enough on Ouattaraās arm to deem it a handball, Webb said it was incorrect of video assistant referee (VAR) Tim Robinson to intervene, with no evidence either way to prove whether or not it was a handball.
āIn this situation, the ball strikes Ouattaraās shoulder, upper-arm area. Itās hard to be totally conclusive as to exactly where,ā said Webb.
āThe VAR looked at this and decided that, in his professional opinion, that was in the area of the arm that has to be penalised below the bottom of the armpit. Thatās the important reference point. I donāt think thatās conclusive enough to intervene.
āEqually, if the goal had been disallowed by the on-field officials, I donāt think thereās evidence here to say that thereās no handball either. So again, it goes back to refereeās call. Itās an important concept. And for those factual matters you need evidence. Itās very clear that the on-field call is wrong, I donāt think we have it here.ā
Related topics
-
-
Published6 June
-