FA contacts OâNeil after comments about officials
-
Published
Wolves boss Gary OâNeil has been contacted by the Football Association after he suggested referees could have a problem with unconscious bias towards bigger clubs.
The FA has asked OâNeil for his observations following his post-match comments after Wolvesâ last-gasp 2-1 defeat by Manchester City.
John Stonesâ injury-time header was eventually awarded following a pitchside review by referee Chris Kavanagh after it had initially been disallowed for offside, with Bernardo Silva standing in front of goalkeeper Jose Sa.
OâNeil remained calm in his post-match comments and reiterated he does not believe there is any knowing bias, but will now have to explain his remarks to the FA which will decide whether to take any further action.
OâNeil said on Sunday: âThereâs no chance people are purposely against Wolves, letâs be clear. But is there something in the subconscious around the decision making â without even knowing it are you more likely to give it to Man City than Wolves?
âMy senses are heightened when we are facing Man City, are the officials the same? When itâs [Erling] Haaland and Man City is there something in there that, not on purpose, influences decision making?
âThey guarantee me there isnât. But they are human and Man City scoring a last-minute winner is a big thing, a bigger thing than Wolves scoring a last-minute goal against West Ham.
âIf I had to upset someone in the street and thereâs a big and little guy in the street, Iâm upsetting the little guy.â
-
-
Published4 hours ago
-
-
-
Published1 day ago
-
Replays showed Silva ducking and not in Saâs line of sight when Stones headed the ball, so Kavanagh awarded the goal.
âStonesâ goal was disallowed on-field due to Bernardo Silva being in an offside position and in the goalkeeperâs line of vision,â the Premier Leagueâs match centre posted on X, formerly Twitter.
âThe VAR deemed Bernardo Silva wasnât in the line of vision and had no impact on the goalkeeper and recommended an on-field review. The referee overturned his original decision and a goal was awarded.â
The offside law states: âThe attacking player is penalised for preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the goalkeeperâs line of vision.â
OâNeil was unhappy with Cityâs winner â which left his side bottom of the Premier League â as he felt it was similar to Max Kilmanâs disallowed header in Wolvesâ 2-1 defeat by West Ham last season.
Tawanda Chirewa was deemed to have impeded Hammers keeper Lukasz Fabianski and the late equaliser was ruled out.
âWe sent clear evidence to the referees Tawanda was not in the line of vision of the West Ham goalkeeper,â OâNeil added.
âThe reason we were told it was still disallowed because he was in close proximity to the goalkeeper. Bernardo Silva didnât end up in Joseâs line of vision but he canât get much closer.
âI hoped in that moment when they were making the decision the same reasoning our West Ham goal was disallowed would mean this one was.â