Chief thought Skripal poisoning could be âact of warâ
A former counter terrorism chief has described how he initially wondered if the poisoning of a former spy and his daughter could have been âan act of warâ.
Former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were exposed to the deadly nerve agent Novichok in Salisbury in March 2018.
Neil Basu, who led the counter-terrorism investigation, said the âtrue horrorâ of the âcolourless and odourlessâ poison was not knowing how to warn people or what to look for.
In an exclusive interview with the BBCâs Salisbury Poisonings podcast, he said: âTo leave that lying around anywhere on foreign soil is the most unbelievably reckless disregard for human life Iâve ever witnessed.â
Just four months later Dawn Sturgess, 44, died after being inadvertently exposed to Novichok eight miles away in Amesbury, Wiltshire. It was concealed inside a perfume bottle which had been gifted to her and contained enough poison to kill thousands of people.
Traces of the chemical weapon were later discovered on the doorknob of Mr Skripalâs home, where police believe it had been planted in a âtargetedâ attack.
Two men, believed to be part of Russiaâs military intelligence service, were named as suspects for their attempted murders in September 2018, with a third suspect added in 2021.
The Russian government and the suspects themselves have always denied any involvement with the attack.
âWeapon of mass destructionâ
Mr Basu said that following the Skripals falling ill, the entire counter-terrorism team were on high alert.
âOne of the things I was thinking was, is this war. You know, is this an act of war?
âYou think of a âweapon of mass destructionâ as being an intercontinental ballistic missile with a nuclear tipped warhead.
âYou donât think of it being in a perfume tester bottle. We didnât know what we were looking for.â
He recalled not knowing how to describe Novichok to the people searching for it and worrying that half the diners at the restaurant would be admitted to hospital and not be able to be treated.
When the news broke of Ms Sturgessâ death, Mr Basu recalled that it âbecame infinitely more serious because it was now the murder of a British citizenâ.
He said the weight of the responsibility was âincredibly hard to bearâ.
âI had to go to the community meeting and explain to Amesbury citizens whether they could feel confident that they wouldnât be the next victim, and there was no way of giving them 100% reassurance.
âI could tell from the look on their faces that they were utterly terrified.
âOne of my responsibilities in charge of counter-terrorism was trying to reduce the fear of it, not just the effect of it.
âBut how do we give reassurance without causing mass panic?â
Public Health England (PHE) released precautionary advice following Ms Sturgessâ death, that âif you didnât drop it, then donât pick it up.â
Mr Basu said he wishes the guidance had been given sooner to prevent the death of an innocent civilian.
âThe reality of spending any time in national security at any level is that people will die on your watch,â he said.
âWhat youâve got to do is try and get justice for the people who died, and to stop it from ever happening again.
âBy the time I retired, 42 innocent people were killed on my watch. Iâd rather it hadnât been a single one.
âIf you asked me to rate my performance, I would say zero, which Iâve spent a long time trying to come to terms with.â
No one has ever been charged for the murder of Dawn Sturgess but in September 2021, an arrest warrant was issued for the suspects in the Skripalsâ poisonings.
However, as the Russian constitution does not permit extradition of its own nationals, they cannot be formally charged unless they try to leave the country.
âIf you ask for my professional hunch, I think we have the murder weapon and we have the murderers,â Mr Basu added.
âIf they need anyone to arrest them as they take one foot off the aircraft, Iâll be there to do it.â
He added that one of the things that weighs heavily on his mind is if there is still more Novichok out there.
In the first week of the Novichok inquiry Ms Sturgessâ partner Charlie Rowley said he had to cut in to packaging with a knife to retrieve the bottle of perfume he later gave as a gift to her.
Mr Basu said: âBut the reality is, is because we didnât know what it was contained in originally, we didnât know whether it was the only one.
âWe didnât know how they got it into the country. And we donât know how they disposed of it because we donât know how Charlie Rowley picked it up. And he doesnât. And, you know, poor man. I mean, I donât think he ever will.â
BBC Sounds: Salisbury Poisonings
Listen to the interview with Neil Basu in full and keep up to date with the latest from the inquiry with our podcast.
Listen to the episode on BBC Sounds.
Follow BBC Wiltshire on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630.