Halep criticises âdifferent approachesâ after Swiatek ban
-
Published
Two-time Grand Slam champion Simona Halep has questioned the âbig differenceâ in how tennis doping cases are handled after world number two Iga Swiatek received a one-month ban.
The International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) announced on Thursday that Swiatek had accepted a one-month suspension after testing positive for banned substance trimetazidine (TMZ).
Halep, who was out of action for more than 18 months following two separate anti-doping violations, has criticised the ITIA for having âcompletely different approachesâ.
âI stand and ask myself, why is there such a big difference in treatment and judgment?â Halep posted on Instagram on Friday.
âI canât find and I donât think there can be a logical answer. It can only be bad will from ITIA, the organization that has done absolutely everything to destroy me despite the evidence.â
Halep was provisionally suspended in October 2022 after testing positive for banned substance roxadustat â an anti-anaemia drug which stimulates the production of red blood cells in the body.
The Romanian was later banned for four years â a period which was reduced to nine months in March after an appeal at the Court of Arbitration for Sport
Halep always maintained her innocence and argued she had taken a contaminated supplement.
âI lost two years of my career, I lost many nights when I couldnât sleep, thoughts, anxiety, questions without answers,â the former world number one said.
âHow is it possible that in identical cases happening around the same time, ITIA to have completely different approaches to my detriment?â
Swiatek tested positive for a heart medication, TMZ, in an out-of-competition sample in August 2024, when she was world number one.
The ITIA accepted the five-time major winnerâs violation was caused by contamination of the regulated non-prescription medication melatonin, manufactured and sold in Poland, which Swiatek took for jet lag and sleep issues.
An ITIA spokesperson told BBC Sport there were âvery important differencesâ between Halepâs case and Swiatekâs.
âNo two cases are the same, they often involve different circumstances, and direct comparisons are not always helpful,â the ITIA said.
âThe product contaminated in Ms Swiatekâs case was a regulated medication, not a supplement.â
Swiatekâs suspension comes after menâs world number one Jannik Sinner tested positive for clostebol in March.
Although the ITIA accepted there was âno fault or negligenceâ attached to the 23-year-old Italian, the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) has launched an appeal to Cas.
The ITIA said: âWe deal with each case based on the facts and evidence, not a playerâs name, ranking or nationality. When a prohibited substance is found in a playerâs system, we investigate it thoroughly.
âWe urge players to exercise extreme caution when taking supplements and we are always happy to answer any questions they have.â
Related topics
-
-
Published6 June
-