Politics pushed on all Instagram and Threads users
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6cb3/b6cb3b11da9e7369a250c40c2398b167f7305869" alt="Getty Images Instagram and Threads logos lit up against a dark background, side by side."
Threads and Instagram users will no longer be able to opt out of being shown political content from people they do not follow, parent company Meta has announced.
The firm says its part of its reorientation towards âfree expressionâ â a move that saw it ditch fact checkers on Tuesday.
The change will be introduced in the US this week before being expanded globally next week.
Users will not be able to turn off unsolicited political posts but can choose between three settings â less, standard or more.
The head of the two platforms Adam Mosseri â who had previously said he was opposed to news and political content â says users have âasked to be shown moreâ of such posts.
But Drew Benvie, chief executive of social media consultancy Battenhall, questioned whether that was accurate, saying the real motivation was the âchanging political windsâ in the US, where Donald Trump will shortly return to the White House.
âThreads and Instagram were largely thought of as âsafe spacesâ, especially compared to the turbulent developments on X,â he told the BBC.
He predicted it could drive people towards rivals such as Bluesky, but said she also worried about the impact on those who stayed on Meta platforms.
This weekâs changes âwill open up the potential for vast amounts of disinformation to spread at speed across a user base of over 2 billion,â he warned.
âIntegrity risksâ
In 2023, Mr Mosseri said Threads and Instagram should focus on âamazing communitiesâ such as âsports, music and fashion.â
âAny incremental engagement or revenue they might drive is not at all worth the scrutiny, negativity (letâs be honest), or integrity risks that come along with them,â he wrote in a Threads post at the time.
But in a fresh post on the platform he has now explained why that stance was being abandoned, saying it had âproven impractical to draw a red line around what is and is not political contentâ â and users have asked to be shown more, not less, of it.
Mr Mosseri said Instagram â which Meta acquired for $1bn in 2012 â was founded upon the values of creativity and âgiving anybody a voiceâ.
âMy hope is that this focus on free speech is going to help us do even a bit better along that path,â he said in an Instagram video.
There has been considerable criticism of the changes Meta has already announced, with concerns expressed about the impact on minority groups.
Some users have also reacted to these latest changes on Threads and Instagram with dismay.
âWell, time to delete the Threads app. It was nice while it lasted,â said one Threads user responding to Mr Mosseriâs posts.
On Instagram â where Mr Mosseri said accounts focused on politics now âdonât have to worry about becoming non-recommendableâ to other users â some users praised the move as âa good step towards the freedom on the platformâ.
Many have also, however, expressed concern about the effect that increasing content recommendations about social issues and politics could have on amplifying misinformation and hate speech.