Murdered girlâs mum says dad would ânever harmâ her

In January, Simon Vickers was found guilty of murdering his 14-year-old daughter Scarlett after a jury rejected his claim he had killed her in a play-fight. His partner, Scarlettâs mother, is adamant it was an accident.
Itâs the question Sarah Hall will hear for the rest of her life â how can she possibly support the man who was convicted of murdering her daughter?
âI know heâd never harm Scarlett,â she insists.
Ms Hall claims 5 July had been a normal Friday night at the familyâs Darlington home.
She says the close-knit trio, who dubbed themselves the Three Sâs, called them âhappy Fridaysâ as it meant another week of work and school was over.

Scarlett ate her dinner and spent the evening in her bedroom, chatting with friends and playing games online.
Her parents drank wine and watched the menâs European Football Championships on TV in the living room.
Vickers also smoked some cannabis, something he regularly did to ease backache caused by his manual job in a factory, Ms Hall says.
At about 22:00 BST, the teenager joined her parents in their small kitchen where her mother was putting the finishing touches to the adultsâ tea, spaghetti bolognese and garlic bread.
Ms Hall becomes very emotional when she describes what happened next.
She and her daughter were throwing grapes into each otherâs mouths, she says, having âjust a fun fightâ.
Vickers also joined in. As Ms Hall was busy draining off the pasta in the sink, her partner of 27 years and their daughter were âmucking about by the back doorâ.
Precisely what happened next is still the source of much confusion for her, but she is certain it was not criminal.

During the play-fight, Ms Hall says she accidentally nipped Vickers with the kitchen tongs.
He reacted and Scarlett âjokinglyâ called him a wimp, Ms Hall says.
Vickers replied âhow would you like itâ and swiped the tongs across the worktop towards his daughter, Ms Hall says.
A kitchen knife had been placed next to the tongs, ready to cut the garlic bread, and Ms Hall believes the utensil caught the knife and wedged it against a granite chopping board, leaving the blade protruding out from the bench.
At that same moment, Scarlett moved towards her dad, perhaps in a bid to grab the tongs, and ran on to the blade, Ms Hall says.
âSomething seriously wrongâ
During Vickersâ trial, he also claimed the injury was inflicted accidentally, but a pathologist said it was âpractically impossibleâ for it to have been caused by anything other than a knife being held firmly in a hand.
Vickers initially said he hurled a knife instead of what he thought was a spatula, but also told paramedics and police at the scene Scarlett had âlungedâ towards him and the blade âjust went inâ.
Sentencing Vickers, judge Mr Justice Cotter said he had âno doubtâ Scarlettâs father had been holding the knife.
What Ms Hall knows for sure is her daughter cried âowâ, then blood started to pour from her side.
âI just thought âthatâs not right, thereâs something seriously wrongâ,â Ms Hall says.

Ms Hall grabbed a tea towel to try and stem the bleeding, her daughter collapsing to the floor.
Vickers took over from her and shouted at Ms Hall to call 999.
It took the ambulance what âfelt like foreverâ to come, but paramedics were actually there within minutes and immediately started trying to save Scarlettâs life.
Their efforts were in vain.
Scarlett died from a single 4in-deep (11cm) stab wound to her chest.
The blade needed only mild force to pass between her ribs and into her heart, causing catastrophic bleeding, a pathologist would later say.
âBecoming an incredible womanâ
The police arrived and Ms Hall and Vickers were arrested for attempted murder and taken to separate police stations.
When Ms Hall was given the news her daughter had died, she cried: âNo, no, please no. My little girl.â
She was given a sedative and put into a cell where she remembers waking up intermittently, crying, before lapsing back into her medicated sleep.
Scarlett was the girl who had always made her parents laugh.
She was bursting with energy, beautiful, boisterous and sassy, her mother says.
âShe was an incredible girl and she was becoming an incredible young woman.â

Both Ms Hall and Vickers were initially charged with murdering their daughter, but the case against her was quickly dropped and Vickers alone stood trial at Teesside Crown Court in January.
The strongest evidence against him was from pathologist Dr Jennifer Bolton, who concluded the knife must have been being firmly held in a hand to cause the injuries it did.
After a 10-day trial, during which Ms Hall gave evidence in support of Vickers, and about 13 hours of deliberation, jurors found him guilty of murder with a 10 to two majority.
Vickers could have pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of manslaughter but Ms Hall says he said he needed âto stand up in court and tell them that he would never, ever harmâ Scarlett.
Jailing him for life with a minimum prison term of 15 years, Mr Justice Cotter said a âmomentary but devastating act of angerâ had robbed Scarlett of her life, adding Vickersâ account of it being a âfreak accidentâ was âunconvincing and wholly implausibleâ.

Ms Hall says that is âabsurdâ, adding her partner ânever had a flash of angerâ.
âI was there that night,â she says. âThere were no arguments. There was no temper, no shouting.â
She says she was shocked when the verdict was announced, adding: âI thought Iâd misheard.
âItâs just been a never-ending nightmare.â
Responding to social media speculation in the aftermath of the trial that Vickers must have been a controlling and abusive partner, Ms Hall said: âNo, never.
âHe was understanding, comforting.
â[Our relationship] was very supportive, never controlling.â

Ms Hall says her family was a happy one and they âdid everything togetherâ.
Vickers and Scarlett had a very loving relationship, Ms Hall says, adding they were âas daft as each otherâ.
When challenged about how she can stay with Vickers, Ms Hall says she is still resolutely supporting him.
âHow can I blame him for an accident when I know heâs in as much pain as I am?â she says.
âIf I thought heâd done it deliberately then no, I wouldnât have been here [doing this interview].
âI would have protected her with my life, as would he.â
At Vickersâ sentencing, the court heard Ms Hallâs and Vickersâ parents remained âresolute in their beliefâ he âdid not intend Scarlett any harmâ.
âIt was a happy houseâ
Ms Hall dreams about her daughter every night, remembering with horror each morning that sheâs really gone.
âI just want her back so much,â she says. âIâm not sleeping well, Iâm not eating well. Iâm just existing.â
She has only been back to their home on Geneva Road three times since Scarlettâs death.
The semi-detached house is now just a âshellâ because âtheyâre not hereâ, she says.
âIt was a happy house,â she says. âI see the memories everywhere.
âEven going back into [Scarlettâs] bedroom, she left a blazer there with all her school stuff still in.
âEverything was just left how it was.â
Vickersâ sentence is set to be reviewed by the Court of Appeal, after Solicitor General Lucy Rigby KC said she thought it was too lenient.
A list of organisations in the UK offering support and information with some of the issues in this story is available at BBC Action Line
Follow BBC North East on X and Facebook and BBC Cumbria on X and Facebook and both on Nextdoor and Instagram.