Are Scotland flattering to deceive? Or is this their level?
France thrash Scotland to become Six Nations champions
-
Published
There was a sense of painful familiarity about Scotlandâs closing Six Nations performance in Paris, as they fell to a 35-16 defeat by champions France for their third loss of the tournament.
They were so dangerous and so competitive for long spells, but a failure to turn pressure into points, coupled with a ropey third quarter against Franceâs monstrous forward replacements, cost them dear.
They trailed by three points on 42 minutes but the deficit was 19 come full-time as a fourth-place finish was confirmed.
Consistently inconsistent has been a theme, with promising spells not converted into a complete 80-minute displays â and not for the first time.
Should Scotland be delivering more? Or are mid-table finishes about right given whatâs at their disposal?
-
-
Published10 hours ago
-
-
-
Published10 hours ago
-
Decisions went against Scotland throughout the championship. Pundits were taken aback when France hooker Peato Mauvakaâs headbutt on Ben White was only punished with a yellow card while the hosts were 10-0 ahead in Paris.
But ultimately, the Scots didnât capitalise against Ireland, England and France when the matches were in the balance and went on to suffer three defeats.
When asked if Scotland deserved to finish higher than fourth, head coach Gregor Townsend was clear.
âNo, if we donât win when we have a lot of the game, thatâs where we are going to finish,â he said.
âIt is a very tough competition. Teams canât play well every game; no-one won a Grand Slam. We are a quality side, it just didnât go our way this year.â
Lack of depth is continual failing
Scotland âcan match worldâs best packsâ â Townsend
France are the benchmark just now. A thriving domestic league, a thriving youth setup, and a thriving grassroots scene. Itâs night and day from the situation in Scotland.
âLook at our player participation numbers,â said former Scotland forward Johnnie Beattie. âFrance have hundreds of thousands and we have around 20,000 adults.
âThat is not something Scottish fans will want to hear but when you look at numbers, that is where we are.â
We can quibble over the precise numbers, perhaps, but the thrust of Beattieâs argument is unimpeachable.
No more was the difference in depth exposed than after 46 minutes of play in Paris, when France head coach Fabien Galthie turned to his bench.
Julien Marchand, Cyril Baille, Dorian Aldegheri, Emmanuel Meafou, Oscar Jegou and Anthony Jelonch were all sent on to turn the tide the home sideâs way.
World-class back-rower and France captain Gregory Alldritt was removed from the fray, because he can be. It worked a treat.
In contrast, Townsend left replacement prop Will Hurd on the bench and asked Zander Fagerson to play the full 80 minutes.
Of those who were introduced, Ewan Ashman is plagued by line-out throwing issues; Ewan Johnson plies his trade in Franceâs second tier with Oyonnax; and Marshall Sykes is not a guaranteed starter for struggling Edinburgh.
The Scottish replacements left everything out on the pitch when they came on, but they are being asked to compete with a different level of player.
It was a similar tale in the defeat by Ireland. Scotland were outthought and outmuscled at Murrayfield.
Former Irish fly-half Ronan OâGara said âit felt like a 40-point winâ for Ireland that day, and he wasnât exaggerating.
When push comes to shove, Scotland are a level below the northern hemisphereâs elite sides.
Necessary high risk not being rewarded
Because of that lack of depth, Scotland are forced to play in a manner that isnât conducive to grinding out Test match win after Test match win.
Their gameplan in Paris was clear. Keep the ball alive, take risks, play with pace and width and get their talented backline involved as much as possible.
âWe played with some fantastic endeavour and were quite sharp on the ball, but we couldnât break through, get in behind and really stress them,â former Scotland full-back Chris Paterson said.
âScotland played the right way, gave ourselves the best opportunity by keeping the ball alive, playing as quick as possible. It wasnât always accurate but itâs the right way to go about it.â
Former Scotland prop Peter Wright echoed those thoughts: âI was pretty proud of the way Scotland played. They stuck at it, went out and tried to play the game that could have beaten France.
âThey had a go, moved the ball, played with width. [Blair] Kinghorn had one of his best games. [Duhan] van der Merwe and [Darcy] Graham looked dangerous.â
â[Finn] Russell will get a lot of criticism for certain things, but I thought he played pretty well and gave Scotland a chance. He varied the game enough to try and hurt the French.â
Townsendâs side were not fixated on playing the percentages and relying on a solid set-piece, because this Scotland team cannot do that.
They have magnificent moments in games, plays that take your breath away, but because of the high-risk strategy they rarely deliver for the duration of a match, let alone for multiple matches across a championship.
Their first-half performance was excellent at Stade de France, but they were brushed aside as legs grew tired and mistakes were punished.
Townsendâs side have beaten Italy and the worst Welsh team for a generation in this tournament. That is it.
Perhaps Wright summed it up best.
âUltimately, France are a better side,â he said. âThere are world-class players all over the pitch, they can bring real quality off the bench and that just adds to the tempo and physicality.â