Child benefit reform plans scrapped
The government is scrapping a planned change to child benefit rules that would have allowed more parents to claim the payment.
Currently child benefit is withdrawn when one parent earns above a certain amount, but the previous Conservative government planned for claims to be based on household income from April 2026.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves made no mention of child benefit in her Budget speech on Wednesday, but the Budget document states that the proposed change would cost too much to implement.
The present system has been criticised as unfair as some households can claim the payment even if their total income is more than that of a single parent or a family with a sole high earner.
You can get child benefit if you are responsible for bringing up a child who is under 16, or under 20 if they stay in approved education or training.
Only one person can claim the benefit for a child. The payments are ÂŁ25.60 a week for the eldest or only child, and ÂŁ16.95 a week for younger children.
In April 2025, these will go up to ÂŁ26.05 a week and ÂŁ17.25 a week respectively.
However, payments are reduced once one parent starts earning at a certain level, known as the High Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC).
In his last Budget in March, former Chancellor Jeremy Hunt raised the income level at which people have to start paying back part of the benefit from ÂŁ50,000 to ÂŁ60,000, and the level at which it is withdrawn completely from ÂŁ60,000 to ÂŁ80,000.
He also announced plans to move to a system where the HICBC is based on household income, not that of individuals, following a consultation.
But the Budget document published on Wednesday said: âThe government will not proceed with the reform to base the HICBC on household incomes. This is because it would have come at a significant fiscal cost of ÂŁ1.4 billion by 2029-30 if setting the threshold to ÂŁ120,000-ÂŁ160,000, where no families would lose out.â
âIt was buried in the documentâ
Father-of-two David Stuart had welcomed Mr Huntâs proposal in March, saying it would make the system âfairerâ.
He said he was disappointed at the decision to abandon it, and at the fact it was âburiedâ in the document and not included in Reevesâs speech.
David, who lives in Whitburn, West Lothian with his wife and two children, now earns more than ÂŁ80,000 so is not entitled to any child benefit. His wife is a self-employed child minder and earns around ÂŁ10,000 a year.
âWe donât necessarily need the full payment,â he said. âBut another couple [earning more] can claim the full thing and we canât claim anything.â
If he and his wife could claim part of the payment, it could go towards âputting money away for the kidsâ, he said.
Laura Suter, director of personal finance at AJ Bell, said: âThereâs no doubt that it would have been a huge administration task for HMRC to assess couples on their household income rather than sole income, meaning there is no easy fix.â
By not going ahead with the change, though, âit means the system that punishes single earners will remainâ.
The Budget document also revealed that the government would allow employed individuals to pay their HICBC through their tax code from 2025, instead of having to submit a self assessment tax return.
Ms Suter said this would improve the âadmin sideâ of child benefit payments, which has been criticised for being confusing.
âHowever, thatâs merely fixing one problem with the system when in reality it needed larger scale reform. The complications in the system mean it is underclaimed and not well understood.â